"' O" INVENTORS : HURRY UP THE
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS -PLEASE "'
The World Students Society Computers-Internet-Wireless is deeply grieved at the loss of all these "very precious lives" in the Malaysian Airline crash:
And what is even more -tragically- alarming is the fact that the technology is just not there to provide immediate coordinates for the search and rescue.
Where the hell are the squawks and pings of an unusual flight occurrence?
We don't have the baseline nor the basepoint for the search. The search is proceeding on what the aviation calls "Dead Reckoning" : of common sense and thoughts and likely visualizations. Shame and Sorrow!
A YOUNG girl -a young student wanted some new lungs. The rules said that she could not have lungs from an adult donor, -but only from another child:
That means she would most probably die!
Janet and Francis Murnaghan complained that the rules discriminated against their daughter Sarah, -a 10year old being treated for cystic fibrosis in Philadelphia.
So they sued to put her on the waiting list for adult lungs. Kathleen Sebelius, the health secretary, ordered a review of the policy but was hesitant to meddle further.
A conservative editorial called her "a death panel of one".
Although the number of transplants is rising, there are never enough organs.
Most donations require someone to die before an ailment has ravaged his insides. Even kidneys are scarce, though you can donate one and still get by with the other.
Americans say they abhor rationing. But they also hate the idea of letting people sell an organ, so rationing is what they are left with.
The process is handled by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), which included doctors, patient advocates and bioethicists, overseen by the health department.
Its policies are complex and inevitably, imperfect.
On June 5th, then, last year, a federal judge ordered Miss Murnaghan to be placed temporarily on the adult waiting list, pending further hearings. A day later the judge ordered similar relief for Javier Acosta:
An 11 year old student in the same situation. The OPTN'S leaders voted on June 10th to let children seeking a spot in the adult queue appeal to an internal review board.
On June 12th Miss Murnaghan finally received a potentially life-saving lung-transplant. Her parents were ecstatic.
Others wondered if this would prompt more people to sue to be moved to the front of the queue.
Congress and the health department issue broad rules for how to distribute organs. Allocation must be "equitable" , for example.
The OPTN must sort out the thorny details. The procedure for lungs is particularly elaborate:
They are allocated according to donor's proximity, blood type and an algorithm to balance the desire to help the afflicted with the desire not to waste organs on those too ill to recover.
A broader question is whether organ donation should favour the young.
The share of total organ recipients aged 50 and older has jumped from 28% in 1988 to 60% last year.
The rise has been even more dramatic for those 65 and older -the share jumped from 2% to 17%. These figures may rise further as the baby-boomers age.
Later the OPTN got to consider a proposal to place young candidates higher in the queue for kidneys, the most commonly transplanted organ.
Supporters point out that the young stand to gain more years of life from a transplant.
"'Opponents retort that all human lives are equally valuable"'.
One day, artificial organs may render this debate irrelevant. For now Student Miss Murnaghan has won a reprieve.
Student Acosta and more than 16,000 other Americans are still waiting for new lungs.
More and more posts will follow in the future on : Organs, transplants, and the unenviable task of rationing organs.
With respectful dedication to the Organ Transplant Surgeons the World over. See Ya all on !WOW! -the World Students Society Computers-Internet-Wireless:
"' Aspire - Inspire "'
Good Night & God Bless!
SAM Daily Times - the Voice of the Voiceless
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Grace A Comment!